Bombing something
does not give you the right to sell
it...
Iraq
is not America's to sell
The Price of War, NYTimes,
June 27, 2004
The
multibillion robbery the US
calls reconstruction
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1247867,00.html
The shameless corporate feeding frenzy in Iraq is fuelling the
resistance
Naomi Klein
Saturday June 26, 2004
The Guardian
Good news out of Baghdad: the Program
Management Office, which oversees the $18.4bn in US reconstruction
funds, has finally set a goal it can meet. Sure, electricity is below
pre-war levels, the streets are rivers of sewage and more Iraqis have
been fired than hired. But now the PMO has contracted the British
mercenary firm Aegis to protect its employees from "assassination,
kidnapping, injury and" - get this - "embarrassment". I don't know if
Aegis will succeed in protecting PMO employees from violent attack, but
embarrassment? I'd say mission already accomplished. The people in
charge of rebuilding Iraq can't be embarrassed, because, clearly, they
have no shame. (
more)
Fiore presents: America's
favorite
contractor
http://www.markfiore.com/animation/favorite.html
CONTRACT SPORT
by JANE MAYER
What did
the Vice-President do for Halliburton?
Issue of 2004-02-16 and 23
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?040216fa_fact
Vice-President Dick Cheney is well
known for his discretion, but his official White House biography, as
posted on his Web site, may exceed even his own stringent standards. It
traces the sixty-three years from his birth, in Lincoln, Nebraska, in
1941, through college and graduate school, and describes his
increasingly powerful jobs in Washington. Yet one chapter of Cheney’s
life is missing. The record notes that he has been a “businessman” but
fails to mention the five extraordinarily lucrative years that he
spent, immediately before becoming Vice-President, as chief executive
of Halliburton, the world’s largest oil-and-gas-services company. The
conglomerate, which is based in Houston, is now the biggest private
contractor for American forces in Iraq; it has received contracts worth
some eleven billion dollars for its work there...Cheney earned
forty-four million dollars during his tenure at Halliburton.

Baker
takes the loaf
Bush's
business partner slices up Iraq
By
Greg Palast
December
11, 2003—Well, ho ho ho! It's an early Christmas for James Baker III.
All
year the elves at his law firm, Baker Botts of Texas, have been working
day and night to prevent the families of the victims of the September
11 attack from seeking information from Saudi Arabia on the kingdom's
funding of al Qaeda fronts.
It's
tough work, but this week the payoff came when president [sic] [sic]
Bush appointed Baker, the firm's senior partner, to "restructure" the
debts of the nation of Iraq.
And who
will net the big bucks under Jim Baker's plan? Answer: his client,
Saudi Arabia, which claims $30.7 billion due from Iraq (plus $12
billion in "reparations" from the First Gulf war).
Puppet
Strings
Let's
ponder what's going on here.
We
are talking about something called 'sovereign debt.' And unless George
Bush has finally 'fessed up and named himself Pasha of Iraq, he is not
their sovereign. Mr. Bush has no authority to seize control of that
nation's assets nor its debts.
But
our president [sic] isn't going to let something as meaningless as
international law stand in the way of a quick buck for Mr. Baker.
more at: http://www.onlinejournal.com/Commentary/121103Palast/121103palast.html
December 11, 2003
Pentagon Finds
Halliburton Overcharged on Iraq Contracts
By DOUGLAS JEHL
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/11/international/middleeast/11CND-PENT.html
ASHINGTON,
Dec. 11 — A Pentagon investigation has found evidence of overcharging
and other violations in billions of dollars worth of reconstruction
contracts for Iraq that were awarded to Vice President Dick Cheney's
former company, military officials said today.
The violations by a Halliburton Company subsidiary, Kellogg, Brown and
Root, could involve "potentially tens of millions of dollars" in
overcharging for fuel that the company is trucking into Iraq under one
of two contracts, said Michael Thibault, deputy director of the Defense
Contract Audit Agency. In a draft report, Mr. Thibault said, the agency
has recommended that the Army Corps of Engineers seek reimbursement
from the company.
A second set of violations, in a second contract with the Army, involve
unacceptable delays by the Halliburton subsidiary in providing cost
estimates to the government for dozens of separate projects already
under way in Iraq, Mr. Thibault said. These violations, for work that
includes the construction of food, housing and other facilities for the
military, could involve overcharging as well, Mr. Thibault said.
December 9, 2003
U.S. Bars Iraq Contracts for Nations That Opposed War
By DOUGLAS JEHL
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/09/international/middleeast/09CND-DIPL.html
ASHINGTON,
Dec. 9 — The Pentagon has barred French, German and Russian companies
from competing for $18.6 billion in contracts for the reconstruction of
Iraq, saying the step "is necessary for the protection of the essential
security interests of the United States."
The directive, which was issued by the deputy defense secretary, Paul
D. Wolfowitz, represents perhaps the most substantive retaliation to
date by the Bush administration against American allies who opposed its
decision to go to war in Iraq.
The administration had warned before the war that countries that did
not join an American-led coalition would not have a voice in decisions
about the rebuilding of Iraq. But the administration had not previously
made clear that French, German and Russian companies would be excluded
from competing for the lucrative reconstruction contracts, which
include the rebuilding of Iraq's infrastructure and equipping its army.
...
The directive by Mr. Wolfowitz does not spell out a precise argument
for why allowing French, German and Russian companies to join in the
competition for the contracts would hurt American security interests.
But it suggests that the main motivation is to use the contracts as a
reward for countries that participate in the American-led coalition and
contribute troops to the American-led security effort.
December 10, 2003
High Payments to Halliburton for Fuel in Iraq
By DON VAN NATTA Jr.
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/09/international/middleeast/09CND-DIPL.html
he
United States government is paying the Halliburton Company an average
of $2.64 a gallon to import gasoline and other fuel to Iraq from
Kuwait, more than twice what others are paying to truck in Kuwaiti
fuel, government documents show.
Halliburton, which has the exclusive United States contract to import
fuel into Iraq, subcontracts the work to a Kuwaiti firm, government
officials said. But Halliburton gets 26 cents a gallon for its overhead
and fee, according to documents from the Army Corps of Engineers.
The cost of the imported fuel first came to public attention in October
when two senior Democrats in Congress criticized Halliburton, the huge
Houston-based oil-field services company, for "inflating gasoline
prices at a great cost to American taxpayers." At the time, it was
estimated that Halliburton was charging the United States government
and Iraq's oil-for-food program an average of about $1.60 a gallon for
fuel available for 71 cents wholesale.
...
The money for Halliburton's gas contract has come principally from the
United Nations oil-for-food program, though some of the costs have been
borne by American taxpayers. In the appropriations bill signed by Mr.
Bush last month, taxpayers will subsidize all gas importation costs
beginning early next year.
In an interview on Tuesday, Mr. Waxman responded to the latest
information on to costs of the Halliburton contract. "It's inexcusable
that Americans are being charged absurdly high prices to buy gasoline
for Iraqis and outrageous that the White House is letting it happen,"
he said.
Halliburton
Hangover
Chellie Pingree, President of Common Cause
and former
majority leader of the Maine Senate, is the author of Maine Rx,
a landmark program to reduce prescription drug costs in that state.
http://www.tompaine.com/feature2.cfm/ID/9377
In terms of sheer size,
the $87 billion Iraq spending bill recently approved by Congress is the
nation’s largest ever for war, bigger than the budgets of the Homeland
Security and Education Departments combined. With so much at stake, you
would think that Congress would have done all it could to ensure that
these tens of billions of dollars are scrupulously monitored and wisely
spent, with no opportunity for waste, fraud or abuse.
But you would
be wrong...
UMaine
US-IRAQ BUSINESS CONFERENCE
POSTPONED
Organizers
have postponed "Doing Business in Iraq: the Private Sector," a
conference that had been scheduled for Thursday, Nov. 13 in
Scarborough. The conference will be moved to a date early in
2004, most likely in March.
http://www.umaine.edu/news/111703/IraqConference.htm
http://www.umaine.edu/globalfocusseries/
UMaine and war profiteering
http://www.bangornews.com/editorialnews/articles/411415_110803umaineandwarprofi_.cfm
A commentary written by
Douglas Allen, a
University of Maine philosophy professor, Ilze Petersons and Eric T.
Olson, a UMaine alumnus. All three are members of the Peace &
Justice Center of Eastern Maine. More than 100 people have additionally
signed this commentary in support.
Why should Maine citizens be
concerned about the University
of Maine's
sponsorship of a conference on "Doing Business in Iraq"? The Bangor
Daily News (Nov. 1-2) quoted the founder of the U.S.-Iraq Business
Alliance, Dennis Sokol, who sees only profit-making opportunities in
Iraq. "When there are diamonds and gold out in the streets, you don't
wait a couple of years to pick it up."
But many of us ask
who will pay the price for these corporate profit gems. Our troops and
Iraqi civilians who are dying so that the wealthy elite can make a
financial killing in Iraq? Mainers and other Americans who see billions
of their tax dollars poured into private contracts for rebuilding Iraq?
Iraqis who have suffered under Saddam, sanctions, and war and now offer
a great opportunity for the war-profiteering "gold rush" by
multinational corporations? Should the University of Maine be a
willing partner and benefit from the war profiteering of corporations
who will pay $850 to attend the conference to hear about "investment
opportunities, the privatization of the country's rich oil fields,
security needs and priority development such as communications and
health care"?
(
read
more...)
Bring Halliburton Home
by Naomi
Klein
Posted
November 6, 2003
http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20031124&s=klein
...[T]he US Army's Law of
Land Warfare states that "the occupant does not have the right of sale
or unqualified use of [nonmilitary] property." This is pretty
straightforward: Bombing something does not give you the right to sell
it...
Even if the selloff of Iraq
were conducted with full transparency and open bidding, it would still
be illegal for the simple reason that Iraq is not America's to sell.
PROFITEERS FOR HIRE
JIm Hightower
11/4/2003
http://www.jimhightower.com/air/read.asp?id=11223
Sometimes I miss the old days. Remember
back when "war profiteering"
actually was thought to be a bad thing? Indeed, Harry Truman considered
it treason.
But now, multi-billion-dollar profiteering by such names as
Halliburton, Bechtel, and Boeing has become such a booming business
that a new kind of corporate consultant has sprung up: Profiteering
facilitator.
Rage Erupts over Iraq War
Profiteering
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/110603F.shtml
A decision by the House Republicans to
strip the Iraq supplemental bill
of an anti-profiteering provision has outraged the Democrats.
The provision — included during the Senate Appropriations Committee
markup with unanimous support but removed in conference — would have
subjected those who deliberately defrauded the United States or Iraq to
jail terms of up to 20 years and costly fines.
HALLIBURTON CONTRACT EXTENSION
CANCELLED AMID ALLEGATIONS OF
OVERCHARGING
TAXPAYERS
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1144461&l=8013
The Army Corps of Engineers is "likely"
to cancel the no-bid contract extension granted a week ago to
Halliburton for delivery of oil-related services amid allegations that
Halliburton is overcharging the federal government to import oil into
Iraq. The decision to revisit the contract extension comes in part due
to the assertions from inside the Pentagon
that Halliburton's price for imported gasoline was "at least double
what it should be."
The Real Winners
A rogue's gallery of war profiteers.
BY TODD TAVARES
http://www.dollarsandsense.org/archives/2003/0703tavares.html
Even as bombs were raining down on
Baghdad, a short list of private beneficiaries was being drawn up
behind closed doors. As the invasion entered its final phase, the
United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Army
Corps of Engineers (funded through the Pentagon) began doling out
contracts.
November 2 BDN Story on UMaine sponsored conference:
http://www.bangornews.com/editorialnews/printarticle.cfm/ID/411003
UMaine to Co-Host Conference on Private Sector
Business in Iraq;
Speakers to Include Key Members of Iraqi Governing
Council and Weinberger
(UMaine co-sponsored) Conference to examine business in post-war Iraq
http://www.pressherald.com/business/stories/030924iraqbiz.shtml
By MATT WICKENHEISER, Portland Press Herald Writer
Former Defense Secretary Caspar
Weinberger is among the speakers for
the $1,500-per-person UMaine co-sponsored event.
The University of Maine will co-sponsor a high-level conference
in
Scarborough exploring business opportunities in Iraq, with speakers
including former Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger.
Brokering War Spoils Should Not be the
Business of the UMaine College of Business
http://deep_blade.tripod.com/journal/
The invasion of Iraq is in large
part about major multinational
corporations divvying up the spoils of war while tens of billions of
U.S. taxpayer dollars are captured by these corporations to support
their taking of the
country. Deep Blade Journal is a web site developed by
Eric Olson, a Peace and
Justice Center member that includes a blog on peace and justice issues
Windfalls of War
U.S. Contractors Reap the Windfalls of Postwar Reconstruction
http://www.publicintegrity.org/wow/
(WASHINGTON, October 30, 2003) - More
than 70 American companies and
individuals have won up to $8 billion in contracts for work in postwar
Iraq and Afghanistan over the last two years, according to a new study
by
the Center for Public Integrity. Those companies contributed more money
to the presidential campaign of George W. Bush -- more than $500,000 --
than to any other politician over the last dozen years, the Center
found.
Report Links Iraq Deals to Bush Donations
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: October 30, 2003
Filed at 11:32 a.m. ET
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/international/AP-Iraq-Contracts.html
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Companies awarded $8
billion in contracts to rebuild
Iraq and Afghanistan have been major campaign donors to President Bush,
and their executives have had important political and military
connections,
according to a study released Thursday.
The study of more than 70 U.S. companies and individual contractors
turned up more than $500,000 in donations to the president's 2000
campaign,
more than they gave collectively to any other politician over the past
dozen years.
Big Bucks in
Iraq
http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20031110&s=shorrock
by Tim Shorrock
comment | Posted October 23, 2003
K Street on the Tigris
http://www.motherjones.com/news/outfront/2003/40/ma_556_01.html
Washington insiders are lining up to
help corporate clients cash in on
rebuilding Iraq, whether the Iraqis like it or not.
By Michael Scherer
Additional Reporting by Jaideep Singh
Washington
Insiders' New Firm Consults
on Contracts in Iraq
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/30/politics/30LOBB.html?ex=1065938106&ei=1&en=624fc2be049543a0
September 30, 2003
By DOUGLAS JEHL
Businessmen linked by their close ties
to President Bush have set up a
firm to advise companies that want to do business in Iraq.
ABSTRACT
-
Businessmen linked by their
close ties to Pres Bush, his family and his administration set up
consulting firm to advise companies that want to do business in Iraq,
including those seeking pieces of taxpayer-financed reconstruction
projects; firm, New Bridge Strategies, is headed by Joe M Allbaugh,
Bush's campaign manager in 2000 and director of Federal Emergency
Management Agency until March; other directors include Edward M Rogers
Jr and Lanny Griffith, lobbyists who were assistants to first Pres Bush
and now have close ties to White House; new company's Web site calls
attention to links between its directors and two Bush administrations;
John Howland, president of company, says it does not intend to seek any
US government contracts itself, but might be middleman to advise other
companies that seek taxpayer-financed business; says company is not
trying to promote its political connections...
Let the serious
looting begin
http://www.workingforchange.com/printitem.cfm?itemid=15673
Geov Parrish - WorkingForChange.com
"Iraq was effectively put up for sale
yesterday, when the US-backed
administration unveiled a sweeping overhaul of the economy, giving
foreign companies unprecedented access to Iraqi firms which are
to be sold off in a privatisation windfall."
UMaine and war profiteering
Why should Maine citizens
be concerned about the University
of Maine's
sponsorship of a conference on "Doing Business in Iraq"? The Bangor
Daily News (Nov. 1-2) quoted the founder of the U.S.-Iraq Business
Alliance, Dennis Sokol, who sees only profit-making opportunities in
Iraq. "When there are diamonds and gold out in the streets, you don't
wait a couple of years to pick it up."
But many of us ask
who will pay the price for these corporate profit gems. Our troops and
Iraqi civilians who are dying so that the wealthy elite can make a
financial killing in Iraq? Mainers and other Americans who see billions
of their tax dollars poured into private contracts for rebuilding Iraq?
Iraqis who have suffered under Saddam, sanctions, and war and now offer
a great opportunity for the war-profiteering "gold rush" by
multinational corporations?
Should the University of Maine be a
willing partner and benefit from the war profiteering of corporations
who will pay $850 to attend the conference to hear about "investment
opportunities, the privatization of the country's rich oil fields,
security needs and priority development such as communications and
health care"? The BDN also reported that the university has paid $1,500
to become one of the forty members of the alliance, along with
for-profit corporations paying from $5,000 to $25,000 to join.
On
Sept. 19, Paul Bremer's U.S.-controlled Coalition Provisional Authority
issued Order 39 by decree. These new "laws," promoted by the Alliance,
allow foreign investors to own 100 percent of any Iraqi asset except
oil and real estate and to remit profits and royalties when they
choose. They reduce import tariffs to 5 percent, allow foreign banks to
take over Iraq's banking system, and, according to U.S.-appointed
finance minister, Kamel al-Gailani, offer Iraq as "one of the most open
countries in the world" for the huge corporations attending the UMaine
conference.
According to Geov Parrish of Working for Change,
foreign firms will be able to bid on l92 of Iraq's public-sector
companies. "The plan allows for more access to the Iraq economy than
almost any other developing nation - with lower taxes, no limit on the
amount of money that may be taken out of the country, no requirements
that Iraqis be hired or otherwise benefit from the successful bidders'
operations." According to Rania Masri of the Institute of Southern
Studies, "A handful of Bush-connected corporations are poised to make
billions in profit while U.S. troops are killed almost daily and Iraq
plunges deeper into a colonial nightmare."
If the U.S.-Iraq
Business Alliance respects Iraq's right to seek "to have a free, fair
and open democratic society that will make its own decisions," as the
executive director of the Alliance claims, how can he also predetermine
for the Iraqi people that "It's the American private sector that will
restore Iraq's greatness" (as quoted in the BDN). Furthermore, the
alliance was formed in June 2002, eight months prior to the time
President Bush announced he had finally decided to invade Iraq.
Clearly, the profit motive was in play long before the president
promoted his questionable case for attacking. Can an invasion and
subsequent economic transformation on these terms lead to democracy for
the Iraqis? We think not.
This past October the U.S.-Iraq
Alliance sponsored a conference in London similar to one being
sponsored by the University of Maine. It was attended by about 100
private companies, mainly from Britain and the United States, to
discuss investment opportunities in post-Saddam Iraq. Corporate
delegates were greeted by protestors from Voices UK, a group opposed to
the war in Iraq. A spokesperson for the protestors said: "After 13
years of war and economic sanctions Iraqis need a reconstruction
process that they control and which is centered on their needs. What we
are seeing is war profiteering on a grand scale and cronyism. Not only
are there concerns about how much ordinary Iraqis will benefit, but it
is actually delaying the reconstruction of the country with potentially
catastrophic consequences. It is outrageous that the United States and
Britain, having illegally invaded and occupied Iraq, are now forcing
their free market ideology on the country whilst selling its assets off
in what can only be described as a fire-sale."
A recent study by
the Center for Public Integrity found that the 10 largest contracts
granted without competitive bidding in Iraq were major campaign donors
to President Bush. The top contractor was Halliburton, the company
headed by Vice President Cheney before he resigned to run with Bush in
2000. The second largest contractor was Bechtel, with former Secretary
of State George Shultz on its board of directors. The keynote speaker
for the "Doing Business in Iraq" conference will be Caspar Weinberger
who was Secretary of Defense under President Ronald Reagan and formerly
vice president and general counsel of the Bechtel Group Cos.
The
University of Maine may sponsor this conference under the guise of
academic freedom, but we question its priorities and academic
integrity. We question the university's complicity with the business of
the exploitation of the Iraqi people by multinational corporations so
closely entwined with the Bush administration and without the necessary
structures in place for Iraqis to decide their own future
democratically.
This commentary was written by Douglas Allen, a
University of Maine philosophy professor, Ilze Petersons and Eric T.
Olson, a UMaine alumnus. All three are members of the Peace &
Justice Center of Eastern Maine. More than 100 people have additionally
signed this commentary in support.